* |
THE REMEDY AND PREVENTION OF MOBBING IN HIGHER
EDUCATION
Two Case Studies
Kenneth Westhues et al.
Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press, about 250
pages.
2006 Available from the publisher and major online retailers |
Therese Warden and Uhuru Watson, tenured professors at Medaille
College in Buffalo, New York, were dismissed for turpitude in 2002. Herbert
Richardson, tenured professor at St. Michael’s College, University of Toronto,
was dismissed for gross misconduct in 1994. On account of abundant similarities
and abundant differences between the cases at these two institutions, rigorous
comparative study of them yields rich insight into the nature, sources,
techniques, and consequences of workplace mobbing in academic institutions.
Especially striking is the difference in outcome: the Medaille mobbings were
corrected to significant degree in 2004, while the one at Toronto remains
unresolved.
Along with its substantive contribution to the scientific study of
mobbing in academe, this book also spells out and illustrates a pragmatist,
dialogic, conversational, democratic methodology for research in this field —
and in social science more generally. It rejects detached, positivist,
authoritarian, jargon-laden methods of inquiry in favor of the classic methods
associated with William James, Jane Addams, George Herbert Mead, and others in
the early Chicago School of Sociology.
The book concludes with the ten-point strategy for prevention of
mobbing in academe, a practical summary of the research program that began in
1991, at the University of Waterloo, Canada.
Table of Contents(almost finalized, February 2006)
Introduction: Substance and Methodology Part One: The Warden/Watson Dismissals at Medaille 1. Overview: The Medaille Project 2. Initial paper, October 2002: "The Mobbings at Medaille College" 3. Second paper, March 2003: “The Medaille Mobbings, Part Two” 4. Third paper, July 2003: “The Medaille Crisis in Mid-2003” 5. January-February 2004: “Report on the Medaille Dismissals,” Committee A, AAUP Part Two: The Richardson Dismissal at Toronto 6. Overview: The Mellen Project 7. “Captains of Erudition: Use and Misuse of Administrative Power,” James Van Patten Response 8. “Canadian Gulag? Comparing the Elimination of Dissidents by Totalitarian Regimes and of Unwanted Professors by University Administrations,” Stan C. Weeber Response 9. “A Good Reason for Mobbing,” Jo A. Baldwin Response 10. “When the Bastards Grind You Under: Conflict Theory versus Social Exchange Theory,”Anson Shupe Response 11. “A Review of Literature on Tenure and Dismissal of Professors,” Barry W. Birnbaum Response 12. “Dreams and Reflections on a Sad Chapter in Canadian Academic History,” James Gollnick Response Conclusion: The Waterloo Strategy for Prevention of Mobbing in Higher Education * Current printing has a slightly different cover. |
Homo Academicus pretende mostrar al campo universitario como un espacio de constante lucha, de desigualdades, de competencias y de formas de dominación institucionalizadas y por todos aceptadas (por miedo) y reproducidas, hasta identificar y analizar el momento donde se pone en riesgo la continuidad de los patrones institucionales dominantes,.... Olvera García, Julio César http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/105/10512244013.pdf
visitantes
Homo Academicus
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
La diversidad de situaciones es grande, sin embargo es posible distinguir ciertas secuencias y patrones,...
ResponderEliminar